亡國第十八

徐干 / 著投票加入书签

77读书网 www.777du.com,最快更新中论最新章节!

    凡亡國之君,其朝未嘗無致治之臣也,其府未嘗無先王之書也,然而不免乎亡者,何也?其賢不用,其法不行也。苟書法而不行其事,爵賢而不用其道,則法無異乎路說,而賢無異乎木主也<span class="q">(两'"乎"字《治要》作"於")</span>。

    昔桀奔南巢,紂踣於京,厲流於彘,幽滅於戯。當是時也,三后之典尚在,而<span class="q">("而"字原脫,據《治要》補)</span>良謀之臣猶存也。下及春秋之世,楚有伍舉、左史倚相、右尹子革、白公子張<span class="q">(《治要》無"白公子張"四字)</span>而靈王喪師,衛有太叔儀、公子鱄、蘧伯玉、史鰌<span class="q">(《治要》無"史鰌"二字)</span>而獻公出奔,晉有趙宣子<span class="q">(《治要》作"孟")</span>、范武子、太史董狐<span class="q">(《治要》無"太史董狐"四字)</span>而靈公被殺<span class="q">(《治要》作"弑")</span>,魯有子家覊、叔孫婼而昭公野死,齊有晏平仲、南史氏而荘公不免弑<span class="q">("弑"字原脫,據《治要》補)</span>,虞、虢有宫之奇、舟之僑而二公絶祀:由是觀之,苟不用賢,雖有無益也。

    然此數國者,皆先君舊臣世禄之士,非遠求也。乃有遠求而不用之者。昔齊宣王<span class="q">(原作"桓公", 據四庫本改。徐湘琳曰:"錢校云,'桓公'當作'宣王'。案,陳士元《孟子雜記》云:'孟子,齊宣王時人。徐幹稱桓公,誤。'")</span>立稷下之宫<span class="q">(原作"官", 據四庫本改)</span>,設大夫之號,招致賢人而尊寵之,自孟軻之徒皆遊於齊;楚春申君亦好賓客,敬待豪傑,四方並<span class="q">("並"字徐本譌作"立")</span>集,食客盈館,且聘荀卿,置諸蘭陵。然齊不益強,黄歇遇難,不用故也。夫遠求賢而不用之,何哉?賢者之爲物也,非若美嬪麗妾之可觀於目也,非若端冕帶裳之可加於身也,非若嘉肴庶羞之可實於口也。將以言策,策不用,雖多亦奚以爲?若欲備百僚之名,而不問道德之實,則莫若鑄金爲人而列於朝也,且無食禄之費矣。然彼亦知有馬必待乘之而後致遠<span class="q">(四字《治要》作"然後遠行")</span>,有醫必待使<span class="q">("使"原作"行",據《治要》、《意林》改)</span>之而後愈疾,至於有賢則不知必待用之而後興治<span class="q">(《意林》作"興理")</span>者<span class="q">(《治要》作"也")</span>,何哉?賢者難知歟?何以遠求之;易知歟?何以不能用也。豈爲寡不足用,欲先益之歟?此又惑之甚也。賢者稱於人也,非以力也,力者必須多,而知者不待衆也。故王卒<span class="q">(原缺一字,諸本皆然。徐本據錢校作"卒",又曰:"《百子全書》本作'臣'。"今據錢校補。)</span>七萬,而輔佐六卿也。故舜有臣五人而天下治,周有亂臣十人而四海服,此非用寡之驗歟!

    且六國之君雖不用賢,及其致人也,猶脩禮盡意,不敢侮慢也。至於王莽,旣不能用,及其致之<span class="q">("之"字原脫,據《治要》補)</span>也,尚不能言。莽之爲人也<span class="q">(《治要》無"也"字)</span>,内實姦邪,外慕古義,亦聘求名儒,徴命術士,政煩敎虐,無以致之,於是脅之以峻刑,威之以重戮,賢者恐懼,莫敢不至。徒張設虚名,以夸海内,莽亦卒以滅亡。且莽之爵人也<span class="q">("也"字原脫,據《治要》補)</span>,其實囚之也。囚人者,非必著之<span class="q">(《治要》無"之"字)</span>桎梏而置之囹圄之謂也,拘係之愁憂之之謂也。使在朝之人,欲進則不得陳其謀,欲退則不得安其身,是則以綸組爲繩索,以印佩爲鉗鐡也<span class="q">(原注:一作"以印綬爲鉗鐡也"。)</span>。小人雖樂之,君子則以爲辱矣<span class="q">("矣"字原脱,據《治要》補)</span>。故明王之得賢也,得其心也,非謂得其軀也。苟得其軀而不論其心也<span class="q">(《治要》無"也"字)</span>,斯與籠鳥檻獸無以異也<span class="q">(《治要》無"未有異也")</span>。則賢者之於我也,亦猶怨讐也<span class="q">(《治要》無"也"字)</span>,豈爲我用哉!雖日<span class="q">("日"字誤原作"曰",據《治要》改。此二字《治要》作"日雖")</span>班萬鍾之禄,將何益歟!故苟得其心,萬里猶近;苟失其心,同衾爲遠。今不脩所以得賢者之心,而務循<span class="q">(《治要》作"脩")</span>所以執賢者之身,至於社稷顛覆,宗廟廢絶,豈不哀哉!

    荀子<span class="q">(《治要》作"孫子")</span>曰:"人主之患<span class="q">(《荀子·致士篇》作"害")</span>,不在乎<span class="q">(《治要》作"於")</span>言不用賢,而在乎<span class="q">(《治要》作"於")</span>誠不用賢<span class="q">(二句《荀子》作"不在乎不言用賢,而在乎不誠必用賢",前賢多疑其誤)</span>。言用賢者<span class="q">(《荀子》句端有"夫"字)</span>,口也;郤賢者,行也。<span class="q">(二句原作"言賢者口也,知賢者行也", 據《治要》及《荀子》改補。"郤"字徐本譌作"欲")</span>,口行相反<span class="q">(《治要》無"相"字,《荀子》有)</span>,而欲賢者之進<span class="q">(《荀子》作"至")</span>,不肖者之退<span class="q">(二"之"字據《治要》及《荀子》補,《荀子》句末有"也"字)</span>,不亦難乎!夫照<span class="q">(《荀子》作"耀")</span>蟬者,務明其火<span class="q">(《荀子》"務"下有"在"字)</span>,振其树而已;火不明,雖振其树無益也。人主有能明其德者<span class="q">(《荀子》句端有"今"字)</span>,則天下其)</span>歸之<span class="q">(《荀子》無"其"字,若蟬之歸火也<span class="q">(《荀子》"火"前有"明"字)</span>。"善哉言乎<span class="q">(《治要》作"也")</span>!昔伊尹在田畝之中,以樂堯、舜之道,聞成湯作興,而自夏如商;太公避紂之惡,居於東海之濱,聞文王作興,亦自商如周;其次則寗戚如齊,百里奚入秦,范蠡如越,樂毅逰燕。故人君苟脩其道義,昭其德音,愼其威儀,審其敎令,刑無頗僻<span class="q">(《治要》作"類")</span>,獄無放殘,仁愛普殷,惠澤流播,百官樂職,萬民得所,則賢者仰之如天地,愛之如親戚<span class="q">(《治要》作"其親")</span>,樂之如塤箎,歆之如蘭芳,故其歸我也,猶决壅導滯注之大壑<span class="q">("滯"下原衍一"水"字,據《治要》删)</span>,何不至之有乎<span class="q">("乎"字原脱,據《治要》補)</span>?苟麤穢暴虐,馨香不登,讒邪在側,佞媚充朝,殺戮不辜,刑罰濫害,宫室崇侈,妻妾無度,撞鐘舞女,淫樂日縱,賦稅<span class="q">(《治要》作"征稅")</span>繁多,財力匱竭,百姓凍餓,死莩<span class="q">(《治要》作"怨喪")</span>盈野,矜己自得,諫者被誅,内外震駭<span class="q">(《治要》作"騷")</span>,遠近怨悲,則賢者之視我容貌也如魍魎<span class="q">(《治要》作"蝄蜽")</span>,臺殿也如狴犴<span class="q">(《治要》作"狴牢")</span>,采服也如衰絰,絃歌也如號哭,酒醴也如滫滌,肴饌也如糞土<span class="q">(此六句《治要》均無中間之"也"字)</span>。從<span class="q">(《治要》作"衆")</span>事舉錯,每無一善,彼之惡我也如是,其肯至哉!今不務明其義,而徒設其禄,可以獲小人,難以得君子。君子者,行不媮<span class="q">(《治要》作"苟")</span>合,立不易方,不以天下枉道,不以樂生害仁,安可以禄誘哉!雖強搏執之而不獲已,亦杜口佯愚,苟免不暇,國之安危將何頼焉<span class="q">(《治要》無"焉"字)</span>。故《詩》曰:"威儀卒迷,善人載尸。"此之謂也。